Interesting
In astrophysics and physical cosmology, Olbers’ paradox, is the argument that the darkness of the night sky conflicts with the assumption of an infinite and eternal static universe. It is one of the pieces of evidence for a non-static universe such as the current Big Bang model. The argument is also referred to as the “dark night sky paradox” (see physical paradox).
Much more here. I love wikipedia!
I remember that this really puzzled me when I was a kid, that is, why the night sky looked the way it did (Olbers’ paradox actually isn’t a good place to start if you want to know that, but anyway…). I didn’t get why, if there was a lot of stars around in the sky, lighting up everything, then even if the universe was very large and the stars were far away, why was everything so dark at night? If there was a star in almost every direction I could see, then why wasn’t the sky much brigther? Also, if the universe was infinitely large (I had a really difficult time accepting that statement), then there would be an infinite number of stars too, rigth (no, that’s not right, see point a in the link. But I didn’t get that back then of course)? And if there was an infinite number of stars, they would light up the whole sky, not just bits and pieces here and there, rigth? Asking my parents didn’t really help… (I’m pretty sure it was during my “asking age” I wondered about this, that period of your life where you drive your parents insane by asking them so many questions that no human being can possibly answer all of them, but I’m also quite sure it took me a long time to pass that age, so that doesn’t really help me pinpoint the exact time).
Btw: If you were wondering, the number of stars visible with the naked eye at night-time at any given location on earth, given ideal viewing conditions, is in the neighbourhood of 3.000, as Asimov expressed it in his book Facts and Fancy (recommended): The faintest star that can be seen with the naked eye, under the best conditions, is of magnitude 6.5 and the number of stars that exist in the entire circuit of the skies that bright or brighter is just about 6000. That’s all. That’s the hard fact of it. Six thousand.
For comparison, it is estimated that the total number of stars in the observable universe is 7×10^22.
Isaac Asimov on 1984
I have just read this lengthy review of 1984 by Isaac Asimov.
HT to teageegeepea for linking to it.
-
Archives
- May 2012 (12)
- April 2012 (13)
- March 2012 (19)
- February 2012 (12)
- January 2012 (16)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (21)
- September 2011 (30)
- August 2011 (26)
- July 2011 (17)
- June 2011 (17)
-
Categories
- 180 grader
- academia
- Africa
- alcohol
- alfred brendel
- American politics
- anthropology
- archaeology
- art
- Arthur Conan Doyle
- astronomy
- atheism
- økonomi
- bøger
- beethoven
- Bent Jensen
- berlingske
- bias
- Bill Bryson
- Bill Watterson
- billeder
- biology
- blogging
- blogs
- books
- Brahms
- bureaucracy
- Canada
- cancer
- Cartoons
- censorship
- Chess
- china
- Chopin
- citater
- Claude Berri
- climate
- comics
- communism
- cosmology
- creationism
- culture
- current affairs
- Cziffra
- Dan Simmons
- Darwin
- data
- dating
- David Copperfield
- david lynch
- demografi
- demographics
- demokrati
- den kolde krig
- denmark
- diabetes
- Dickens
- Dinu Lipatti
- disagreement
- Douglas Adams
- Dragsdal
- econometrics
- economic history
- economics
- education
- Edward Grieg
- egypt
- Eliezer Yudkowsky
- ethics
- EU
- evolution
- Ezra Levant
- Filippo Pacini
- financial regulation
- Flemming Rose
- Fogh
- foreign aid
- Forskelligt
- France
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Franz Kafka
- freedom of speech
- Friedrich von Flotow
- fun
- Fyodor Dostoevsky
- game theory
- Garry Kasparov
- genetics
- George Carlin
- george enescu
- global warming
- government
- Grahame Clark
- greg mankiw
- Hamelin
- harry potter
- health
- health care
- hemingway
- historie
- history
- Homer
- hypocrisy
- immigration
- indvandring
- integration
- IQ
- isaac asimov
- islam
- Jane Austen
- Japan
- jesusandmo
- John Stuart Mill
- Jon Stewart
- Joseph Heller
- Journalism
- journalistik
- jp
- jura
- karl popper
- Khan Academy
- knowledge sharing
- kommunisme
- kriminalitet
- kultur
- landbrug
- language
- løb
- Leland Yeager
- Lenin
- Liszt
- litteratur
- machiavelli
- Marcel Pagnol
- Maria João Pires
- Mark Steyn
- Mark Twain
- marriage
- Martin Amis
- Martin Paldam
- mathematics
- media
- medicine
- medier
- mendelsohn
- menneskerettigheder
- meta
- mikhail gorbatjov
- Mikkel Plum
- Montefiore
- Monty Python
- Morten Uhrskov Jensen
- movies
- Mozart
- Muhammedtegningerne
- music
- musik
- Muzio Clementi
- Nature
- nfl
- Nikolai Medtner
- North Korea
- nuclear proliferation
- nuclear weapons
- Obama
- Ole Vagn Christensen
- orwell
- Oscar Wilde
- overcomingbias
- Paleontology
- papers
- Pascal's Wager
- paternalisme
- people are strange
- personal
- personligt
- philosophy
- pictures
- politics
- politik
- politisk filosofi
- polls
- Psychology
- public choice
- quotes
- Rachmaninoff
- rambling nonsense
- random stuff
- Rationality
- regulation
- regulering
- religion
- Richard Dawkins
- Rochefoucauld
- Rowan Atkinson
- Rusland
- Russia
- samizdata
- sandmonkey
- Sartre
- Saudi Arabia
- Schumann
- science
- science fiction
- skak
- Solzhenitsyn
- Stalin
- statistics
- studies
- stupidity
- Sun Tzu
- Sundhed
- Tariq Ramadan
- taxation
- technology
- terrorisme
- Terry Pratchett
- The Art of War
- The Onion
- Thomas More
- Tolstoi
- tradeoffs
- tvangsfjernelser
- tyler cowen
- Uncategorized
- US presidential election
- USA
- valg
- velfærdsstaten
- voting
- walter gieseking
- Weekendavisen
- wikipedia
- William Easterly
- xkcd
- youtube
- ytringsfrihed
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS