Pride and Prejudice
I felt like I ought to write a post about the book, I’ve neglected book posts for a while, mostly because I haven’t read all that much but also because I just didn’t feel like it. I got Dilbert 2.0 for Christmas and I’ve read nothing else since December 24th. I completed it last night, but I probably won’t post anything related to that book here. It’s great, if you like Scott Adams’ cartoon it’s a book you ought to own.
Quotes from Austen below. Quote 5 and forward contain spoilers to some degree, if you feel like reading the book soon or you have an eidetic memory I’d advise you to not read past that point, even though none of the quotes answer the two questions you are most likely to be asking yourself while reading the last 50-100 pages:
…
1. ‘Pride,’ observed Mary, [...] ‘is a very common failing I believe. By all that I have ever read, I am convinced that it is very common indeed, that human nature is particularly prone to it, and that there are very few of us who do not cherish a feeling of self-complacency on the score of some quality or other, real or imaginary. Vanity and pride are different things, though the words are often synonymously. A person may be proud without being vain. Pride relates more to our opinion of ourselves, vanity to what we would have others think of us.’ (p.14)
2. ‘I wish Jane success with all my heart; and if she were married to him tomorrow, I should think she had as good a chance of happiness, as if she were to be studying his character for a twelvemonth. Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance. If the dispositions of the parties are ever so well known to each other, or ever so similar beforehand, it does not advance their felicity in the least. They always continue to grow sufficiently unlike afterwards to have their share of vexation; and it is better to know as little as possible of the defects of the person with whom you are to pass your life.’ (p.16)
3.’Nothing is more deceitful’, said Darcy, ‘than the appearance of humility. It is often only carelessness of opinion, and sometimes an indirect boast.’ (p.33)
4.’Oh! Mr. Bennet, you are wanted immediately; we are all in an uproar. You must come and make Lizzy marry Mr Collins, for she vows she will not have him, and if you do not make haste he will change his mind and not have her.’ (p.77. ‘If neither want to marry the other then what’s the problem?’ you might ask. This is England in the beginning of the 19th century. That’s the problem.)
5. ‘I tell you what, Miss Lizzy, if you take it into your head to go on refusing every offer of marriage in this way, you will never get a husband at all – and I am sure I do not know who is to maintain you when your father is dead. – I shall not be able to keep you – and so I warn you. – I have done with you from this very day. – I told you in the library, you know, that I should never speak to you again, and you will find me as good as my word. I have no pleasure in talking to undutiful children.’ (p.79. Imagine a parent making the same speech today.)
6. [3 days after Mr Collins' marriage proposal to Lizzy, he proposed to Charlotte Lucas:] ‘Sir William and Lady Lucas were speedily applied to for their consent; and it was bestowed with a most joyful alacrity. Mr Collins’s present circumstances made it a most eligible match for their daughter, to whom they could give little fortune; and his prospects of future wealth were exceedingly fair. Lady Lucas began directly to calculate with more interest than the matter had ever excited before, how many years longer Mr Bennet was likely to live… The whole family in short were properly overjoyed on the occasion. The younger girls formed hopes of coming out [US: get married] a year or two sooner than they might otherwise have done; and the boys were relieved from their apprehension of Charlotte’s dying an old maid. Charlotte herself was tolerably composed. She had gained her point, and had time to consider of it. Her reflections were in general satisfactory. Mr Collins to be sure was neither sensible nor agreeable; his society was irksome, and his attachment to her must be imaginary. But still he would be her husband. – Without thinking highly either of men or matrimony, marriage had always been her object; it was the only honorable provision for well-educated young women of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want. This preservative she had now obtained; and at the age of twenty-seven [judging from the book, at that point in time most women were married long before they reached that age - take this quote for instance: 'Jane will be quite an old maid soon, I declare. She is almost three and twenty!' Lydia, p.149], without having ever been handsome, she felt all the good luck of it.’ (p. 85. The woman who’s about to marry the guy think of him that way, the woman who rejected him is more blunt: ‘Mr Collins is a conceited, pompous, narrow-minded, silly man’ (p.93). I agree with the latter description of the guy, based on what’s in the book, though I’d add a few modern terms such as ‘dirtbag’ and ‘asshole’ after having read the guy’s letter to Mr Bennet regarding the Lydia affair, later in the book.)
7. ‘Had Elizabeth’s opinion been all drawn from her own family, she could not have formed a very pleasing picture of conjugal felicity or domestic confort. Her father, captivated by youth and beauty, and that appearance of good humour, which youth and beauty generally give, had married a woman whose weak understanding and illiberal mind, had very early in their marriage put an end to all real affection for her. Respect, esteem, and confidence, had vanished for ever; and all his views of domestic happiness were overthrown.’ (p.159)
8. ‘But can you think that Lydia is so lost to everything but love of him, as to consent to live with him on any other terms than marriage?’
‘It does seem, and it is most shocking indeed,’ replied Elizabeth, with tears in her eyes, ‘that a sister’s sense of decency and virtue in such a point should admit of doubt. But really, I know not what to say.’ (p.189. Oh yes, living with a man without being married? The horror! But things were different back then. Very different…)
9. ‘The engagement between them is of a peculiar kind. From their infancy, they have been intended for each other. [...] While in their cradles, we planned the union: and now, at the moment when the wishes of [the people planning the union] would be accomplished, in their marriage, to be prevented by a young woman of inferior birth, of no importance in the world, and wholly unallied to the family! Do you pay no regard to the wishes of his friends? To his tacit engagement [...]? Are you lost to every feeling of propriety and delicacy? Have you not heard me say, that from his earliest hours he was destined for [the other woman]?’ (p.238)
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- February 2012 (10)
- January 2012 (16)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (21)
- September 2011 (30)
- August 2011 (26)
- July 2011 (17)
- June 2011 (17)
- May 2011 (17)
- April 2011 (14)
- March 2011 (14)
-
Categories
- 180 grader
- academia
- Africa
- alcohol
- alfred brendel
- American politics
- anthropology
- archaeology
- art
- Arthur Conan Doyle
- astronomy
- atheism
- økonomi
- bøger
- beethoven
- Bent Jensen
- berlingske
- bias
- Bill Bryson
- Bill Watterson
- billeder
- biology
- blogging
- blogs
- books
- Brahms
- bureaucracy
- Canada
- cancer
- Cartoons
- censorship
- Chess
- china
- Chopin
- citater
- Claude Berri
- climate
- comics
- communism
- cosmology
- creationism
- culture
- current affairs
- Cziffra
- Dan Simmons
- Darwin
- data
- dating
- David Copperfield
- david lynch
- demografi
- demographics
- demokrati
- den kolde krig
- denmark
- diabetes
- Dickens
- Dinu Lipatti
- disagreement
- Douglas Adams
- Dragsdal
- econometrics
- economic history
- economics
- education
- Edward Grieg
- egypt
- Eliezer Yudkowsky
- ethics
- EU
- evolution
- Ezra Levant
- Filippo Pacini
- financial regulation
- Flemming Rose
- Fogh
- foreign aid
- Forskelligt
- France
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Franz Kafka
- freedom of speech
- Friedrich von Flotow
- fun
- Fyodor Dostoevsky
- game theory
- Garry Kasparov
- genetics
- George Carlin
- george enescu
- global warming
- government
- Grahame Clark
- greg mankiw
- Hamelin
- harry potter
- health
- health care
- hemingway
- historie
- history
- Homer
- hypocrisy
- immigration
- indvandring
- integration
- IQ
- isaac asimov
- islam
- Jane Austen
- Japan
- jesusandmo
- John Stuart Mill
- Jon Stewart
- Joseph Heller
- Journalism
- journalistik
- jp
- jura
- karl popper
- Khan Academy
- knowledge sharing
- kommunisme
- kriminalitet
- kultur
- landbrug
- language
- løb
- Leland Yeager
- Lenin
- Liszt
- litteratur
- machiavelli
- Marcel Pagnol
- Maria João Pires
- Mark Steyn
- Mark Twain
- marriage
- Martin Amis
- Martin Paldam
- mathematics
- media
- medicine
- medier
- mendelsohn
- menneskerettigheder
- meta
- mikhail gorbatjov
- Mikkel Plum
- Montefiore
- Monty Python
- Morten Uhrskov Jensen
- movies
- Mozart
- Muhammedtegningerne
- music
- musik
- Muzio Clementi
- Nature
- nfl
- Nikolai Medtner
- North Korea
- nuclear proliferation
- nuclear weapons
- Obama
- Ole Vagn Christensen
- orwell
- Oscar Wilde
- overcomingbias
- Paleontology
- papers
- Pascal's Wager
- paternalisme
- people are strange
- personal
- personligt
- philosophy
- pictures
- politics
- politik
- politisk filosofi
- polls
- Psychology
- public choice
- quotes
- Rachmaninoff
- rambling nonsense
- random stuff
- regulation
- regulering
- religion
- Richard Dawkins
- Rochefoucauld
- Rowan Atkinson
- Rusland
- Russia
- samizdata
- sandmonkey
- Sartre
- Saudi Arabia
- Schumann
- science
- science fiction
- skak
- Solzhenitsyn
- Stalin
- statistics
- studies
- stupidity
- Sun Tzu
- Sundhed
- Tariq Ramadan
- taxation
- technology
- terrorisme
- Terry Pratchett
- The Art of War
- The Onion
- Thomas More
- Tolstoi
- tradeoffs
- tvangsfjernelser
- tyler cowen
- Uncategorized
- US presidential election
- USA
- valg
- velfærdsstaten
- voting
- walter gieseking
- Weekendavisen
- wikipedia
- William Easterly
- xkcd
- youtube
- ytringsfrihed
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
[...] First novel in the book. I’ll skip the next as I’ve previously read Pride and Prejudice. [...]
Pingback by Sense and Sensibility « Econstudentlog | June 26, 2011 |