Econstudentlog

Ramadan and medical risk

‘If you know someone in southeastern Uganda who is having a baby next year, you should hope with all your heart that the baby isn’t born in May. If so, it will be roughly 20 percent more likely to have visual, hearing, or learning disabilities as an adult.
Three years from now, however, May would be a fine month to have a baby. But the danger will only have shifted, not disappeared; April would now be the cruelest month.

[...]

The economists Douglas Almond and Bhashkar Mazumder have a simple answer for this strange and troubling phenomenon: Ramadan. [...] Islam calls for a daytime fast from food and drink for the entire month of Ramadan. Most Muslim women participate even while pregnant; it’s not a round-the-clock fast, after all. Still, as Almond and Mazumder found by analyzing years’ worth of natality data, babies that were in utero during Ramadan are more likely to exhibit developmental aftereffects. The magnitude of these effects depends on which month of gestation the baby is in when Ramadan falls. The effects are strongest when fasting coincides with the first month of pregnancy, but they can occur if the mother fasts at any time up to the eighth month.’

From chapter 2 of Superfreakonomics, a book I as previously mentioned on the twitter am currently reading. Do note that the largest risk is at the point in time where the woman is least likely to be aware that she’s even engaging in risky behaviour that might hurt her child. There’s both the likelihood that she doesn’t know that she’s pregnant and there’s the timing issue; a pregnant woman say in the third trimester has probably known for a long time that she’d be pregnant during the fasting period and she’s had plenty of time to seek medical advice, whereas a woman who’s just gotten pregnant is far less likely to know all the relevant risks relating to her pregnancy, of which fasting is but one of many. And yes, I am well aware that this is far from the only relevant effect of Ramadan – it also ie. increases the risk of traffic accidents.

Unfortunately I don’t think mentioning these things to a female muslim will make her much less likely to choose to fast – however maybe I’m wrong. My ‘gut feeling’ is this: The higher the perceived costs of this practise, the more the female will feel like a ‘pure muslim’ when doing it; the more reinforced will be her conviction that she’s a better person than people who do not fast. I mean – if fasting is just a stupid ancient practise devoid of any meaning, you’d be a bloody moron to do it, right? So you make up stories to make the behaviour look ‘reasonable’. Also, if you don’t defend the madness, you’re not part of the group, you can’t be trusted, and the madder the madness is, the better it works as a selection mechanism because it gets easier to tell the difference between the truly mad and the posers. There’s a reason religion is still around. One of the more efficient ways to make people believe stupid things is to make doing stupid things seem like the smart thing to do. Once you get used to doing stupid things, believing stupid things will come completely natural to you. That’s why god invented prayer. No, wait…

August 14, 2010 - Posted by | books, islam, religion

4 Comments »

  1. Jeg har personligt talt med en troende muslimsk kvinde om det her, og hun afviste 100 %, at der kunne være nogen som helst sundhedsskade forbundet med at faste, for hvis der var det, så ville gud, den alvidende, jo ikke have ordineret det. Det var tværtimod sundt. Jeg spurgte så, hvorfor hun ikke fastede hele året, hvis det var så sundt, og så ville hun ikke snakke med mig mere.

    Comment by Ulla Lauridsen | September 6, 2010 | Reply

  2. Noget helt andet er, at gravide kvinder faktisk ikke skal faste ifølge koranen, ligesom børn og syge ikke skal, men de gør det jo alligevel.

    Comment by Ulla Lauridsen | September 6, 2010 | Reply

  3. “Jeg spurgte så, hvorfor hun ikke fastede hele året, hvis det var så sundt, og så ville hun ikke snakke med mig mere.”
    :)

    Gud har jo kun ‘ordineret’ det en måned om året, så selvfølgelig er det kun sundt at faste en måned om året, ikke at gøre det hele året rundt. Hvis det var sundt at gøre hele året rundt ville gud/allah have beordret os til at gøre det – det siger sig selv. Eller det ville være mit svar, hvis jeg var født og opvokset som muslim.

    “Noget helt andet er, at gravide kvinder faktisk ikke skal faste ifølge koranen, ligesom børn og syge ikke skal, men de gør det jo alligevel.”

    Det er rigtigt nok, men i den sammenhæng kunne man jo godt være af den mening, at det er overordentligt interessant, at nogle af de kvinder (og ufødte børn) som forventeligt vil rammes hårdest af fastens negative helbredseffekter så også samtidig er dem, der nærmest umuligt kan vide, at de ikke burde faste. Det har den alvidende gud vist ikke tænkt helt igennem, har han? Enten det, eller også er han bare et dumt svin.

    Comment by US | September 6, 2010 | Reply

  4. Det har du helt ret i. Noget kunne tyde på, at det IKKE er en alvidende gud, der har fundet på det.
    Eller også er det os, der har misforstået Gud. Måske ER han alvidende og har en mentalitet ligesom de der videnskabeligt entreprenante medicinske forskere i KZ-lejrene.

    Comment by Ulla Lauridsen | September 9, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 79 other followers

%d bloggers like this: